2019/05/09 by Alexander L. Brown, Brown, Alexander L., Rodrigo A. Velez +1
Decision Sciences · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Social Sciences · #Auction Theory and Applications #Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies #FOS: Economics and business #General Economics (econ.GN) #Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.03876
openalex publication_date 2019/05/09 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
We experimentally evaluate the comparative performance of the winner-bid, average-bid, and loser-bid auctions for the dissolution of a partnership. The analysis of these auctions based on the empirical equilibrium refinement of Velez and Brown (2020) arXiv:1907.12408 reveals that as long as behavior satisfies weak payoff monotonicity, winner-bid and loser-bid auctions necessarily exhibit a form of bias when empirical distributions of play approximate best responses (Velez and Brown, 2020 arXiv:1905.08234). We find support for both weak payoff monotonicity and the form of bias predicted by the theory for these two auctions. Consistently with the theory, the average-bid auction does not exhibit this form of bias. It has lower efficiency that the winner-bid auction, however.