2019/11/06 by James Lucas, George Tucker, Lucas, James +5 · 10 citations
Computer Science · Physics and Astronomy · #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis #Image and Signal Denoising Methods #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Model Reduction and Neural Networks
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.02469
openalex publication_date 2019/11/06 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Posterior collapse in Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) arises when the variational posterior distribution closely matches the prior for a subset of latent variables. This paper presents a simple and intuitive explanation for posterior collapse through the analysis of linear VAEs and their direct correspondence with Probabilistic PCA (pPCA). We explain how posterior collapse may occur in pPCA due to local maxima in the log marginal likelihood. Unexpectedly, we prove that the ELBO objective for the linear VAE does not introduce additional spurious local maxima relative to log marginal likelihood. We show further that training a linear VAE with exact variational inference recovers an identifiable global maximum corresponding to the principal component directions. Empirically, we find that our linear analysis is predictive even for high-capacity, non-linear VAEs and helps explain the relationship between the observation noise, local maxima, and posterior collapse in deep Gaussian VAEs.