1972/04/01 by Raymond J. Struyk
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis #Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis #Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
paper · doi:10.2307/142874
* The author wishes to acknowledge the generous donation of the data upon which this paper is based to the National Bureau of Economic Research by Dun and Bradstreet, Inc. This research was completed while the author was at the National Bureau of Economic Research. The article has not, however, been reviewed by its board of directors, and therefore represents only the author's views. 1 This evidence is presented in Hoover and Vernon [1], and Vernon [3]. 2 A complete .description of the DMI data and the procedures followed in adapting them to the study of intrametropolitan industrial location can be found in James [2]. One particularly important aspect of the employment data is that they have been generally adjusted so as not to include office workers not directly related to the production process. Thus, in this respect, the employment figures correspond with the all employees used in the Census of Manufacturers. 1965 in the Cleveland, Boston, and Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan areas. Method. Two definitional issues had