vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Convergence Analysis of Decentralized ASGD

2023/09/07 by Mauro DL Tosi, Tosi, Mauro DL, Martin Theobald +1 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Engineering · #Advanced Memory and Neural Computing #Distributed #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks #Parallel #Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques #and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.03754

openalex publication_date 2023/09/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

Over the last decades, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has been intensively studied by the Machine Learning community. Despite its versatility and excellent performance, the optimization of large models via SGD still is a time-consuming task. To reduce training time, it is common to distribute the training process across multiple devices. Recently, it has been shown that the convergence of asynchronous SGD (ASGD) will always be faster than mini-batch SGD. However, despite these improvements in the theoretical bounds, most ASGD convergence-rate proofs still rely on a centralized parameter server, which is prone to become a bottleneck when scaling out the gradient computations across many distributed processes. In this paper, we present a novel convergence-rate analysis for decentralized and asynchronous SGD (DASGD) which does not require partial synchronization among nodes nor restrictive network topologies. Specifically, we provide a bound of O(σε-2) + O(QSavgε-3/2) + O(Savgε-1) for the convergence rate of DASGD, where Savg is the average staleness between models, Q is a constant that bounds the norm of the gradients, and ε is a (small) error that is allowed within the bound. Furthermore, when gradients are not bounded, we prove the convergence rate of DASGD to be O(σε-2) + O(√SavgSmaxε-1), with Smax and Savg representing a loose version of the average and maximum staleness, respectively. Our convergence proof holds for a fixed stepsize and any non-convex, homogeneous, and L-smooth objective function. We anticipate that our results will be of high relevance for the adoption of DASGD by a broad community of researchers and developers.

Cited by

Related