Expressive Responding and Belief in 2020 Election Fraud

2023/07/26 by Matthew H. Graham, Matthew Graham, Omer Yair · 1 voice · 49 citations
Decision Sciences · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Big data #Computer science #Deception #Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics #Democracy #Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies #Honesty #Law #Lie detection #Political science #Politics #Power (physics) #Psychology #Psychology of Social Influence #Social psychology

paper · doi:10.1007/s11109-023-09875-w

published in Political Behavior 46(2), 1349-1374 (Springer Science+Business Media)

openalex publication_date 2023/07/26 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23

Citations

• Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship
• Political Homophily in Social Relationships: Evidence from Online Dating Behavior
• Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?

Cited by

• Liars know they are lying: differentiating disinformation from disagreement
• Partisan Expressive Responding: Lessons from Two Decades of Research
• Expressive Responding and the Economy: The Case of Trump’s Return to Office
• Betting on Scams
• Beyond Belief Change: The Persuasive Returns of Targeting Attitude–Relevant Beliefs
• Identity after the ballot: How winning and losing impact partisan attachments and affective polarization
• Investigating conspiracy beliefs: methodological biases and experimental challenges
• Less Partisan but No More Competent: Expressive Responding and Fact-Opinion Discernment
• Partisanship, Social Desirability, and Belief in Election Fraud: Evidence from the 2022 US Midterm Elections
• Different honesty conceptions align across US politicians' tweets and public replies. [europepmc]

Discussions

• Do Americans who endorse Trump's 2020 election lies really believe him? Yes. Just published in Political Behavior: doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09875-w [bsky, 35 points, 3 comments]