The Quantum Eraser Non-Paradox: a comment on arXiv:2111.09347v1

2021/11/26 by Aurélien Drezet, Drezet, Aurélien
Physics and Astronomy · Psychology · #FOS: Physical sciences #History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph) #Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum Physics (quant-ph) #Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.13357

openalex publication_date 2021/11/26 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

This is a short reply to arXiv:2112.00436v1 and arXiv:2111.09347v1 by C. Bracken, J.R. Hance, and S. Hossenfelder. I precise some elements concerning i) the methodology of my previous version of the comment [arXiv:2111.13357v3] to arXiv:2111.09347v1, and ii) why the grand father-paradox (causal loop) presented in their article comes from a prejudice concerning retrocausality not from retrocausality or locality themselves.

Related

• The Quantum Eraser Paradox
• A logical interpretation of a delayed-choice, quantum eraser experiment
• Quantum mechanical 'Backward in Time'? Comments, Answers, and the Causal Indistinguishability Condition
• Time Symmetric Quantum Theory Without Retrocausality? A Reply to Tim Maudlin
• The Enigma of Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser