A Cross-Cutting Calm
2016/01/01 by Lilliana Mason · 406 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Anger #Biology and political orientation #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Enthusiasm #Identity (music) #Law #Perception #Political science #Politics #Psychology #Social Media and Politics #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Social group #Social identity theory #Social psychology
paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw001
published in Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1), 351-377 (Oxford University Press)
openalex publication_date 2016/01/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06
Abstract
Although anecdotal stories of political anger and enthusiasm appear to be provoked largely by issues such as gay marriage or healthcare reform, social sorting is capable of playing a powerful role in driving anger and enthusiasm, undercutting the perception that only practical disagreements are driving higher levels of political rancor. Because a highly aligned set of social identities increases an individual’s perceived differences between groups, the emotions that result from group conflict are likely to be heightened among well-sorted partisans. An experimental design in a national online survey manipulates political threats and reassurances, including a threat to a party and a threat to distinct policy goals. Issue positions are found to drive anger and enthusiasm in the presence of issue-based messages, but not all party-based messages. Partisan identity drives anger and enthusiasm in the presence of party-based threats and reassurances, but not all issue-based messages. Social sorting, however, drives anger and enthusiasm in response to all threats and reassurances, suggesting that well-sorted partisans are more reliably emotionally reactive to political messages. Finally, these results are driven not by the most-sorted partisans, but by the emotional dampening effect that occurs among those with the most cross-cutting identities. As social sorting increases in the American electorate, the cooler heads inspired by cross-cutting identities are likely to be taking up a smaller portion of the electorate.
Citations
Cited by
- The Urban–Rural Divide in People’s Minds: Stereotypes of Urbanites and Ruralites in Nine European Countries
- Using large-language models to analyse social media engagement with the public sector communication on circular economy: Evidence from X
- Mediale Trigger. Emotionen und Argumente in deutschen Pressekommentaren
- ‘Seen one, seen ‘em all’: political outgroup homogeneity and negative affect
- Status Threat and American Identity in a Multiracial Democracy
- How Withheld Punishment Enables Authoritarian Persistence: An Evolutionary Dynamics Approach
- Looks Like a Leader: Measuring Evolution in Gendered Politician Stereotypes
- Affective Polarization: Over Time, Through the Generations, and During the Lifespan
- Party Animals? Extreme Partisan Polarization and Dehumanization
- Grand Old (Tailgate) Party? Partisan Discrimination in Apolitical Settings
- Political polarization and health
- Place, education, and voting along the transnational cleavage in Europe
- Estimating affective polarization on a social network
- How Violations of Electoral Integrity Undermine Partisan Attachments
- What explains election-driven family conflicts?
- Common Identities and Political Talk: Evaluating Cross-Cutting Political Discussions in Sports Communities on Reddit
- Does Talking to the Other Side Reduce Inter-party Hostility? Evidence from Three Studies
- Reducing Affective Polarization: Warm Group Relations or Policy Compromise?
- You’re Making Us Look Bad: Can Partisan Embarrassment Dampen Partisanship and Polarization?
- The Strengthening of Partisan Affect
- Human Life Is Group Life: Deliberative Democracy for Realists
- Determinants of Affective Polarization in Mexico's 2018 Presidential Election
- Inclusion to exclude: how femonationalism impacts policy preferences
- Whose Kulturkampf? Asymmetric cleavage mobilisation and the 2023 Turkish elections
- The Emotional Dynamics of Partisan Media and Political Misperceptions
- Seeing Red (And Blue): Partisan Identity, Emotions, and Selective Exposure
- Is Partisan Selective Exposure an American Peculiarity? A Comparative Study of News Browsing Behaviors in the United States, Japan, and Hong Kong
- Division Does Not Imply Predictability: Demographics Continue to Reveal Little About Voting and Partisanship
- Partisan Bias in Bipartisan Places?
- Perspective-Taking and Partisan Depolarization in the U.S. and Turkey
- Descriptive or Partisan Representation? Examining Trade-Offs for Asian Americans
- From triggering reflective thinking to causing backlash: how experienced argument exposure frequency and balance affect political tolerance in the context of climate action
- Affective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings
- Understanding Online Polarization Through Human-Agent Interaction in a Synthetic LLM-Based Social Network
- Polarization in Black and White
- Camps, not just parties. The dynamic foundations of affective polarization in multi-party systems
- Ideological identity, issue-based ideology and bipolar affective polarization in multiparty systems: The cases of Argentina, Chile, Italy, Portugal and Spain
- Tweeting ourselves to death: the cultural logic of digital capitalism
- Enemy Mine: Negative Partisanship and Satisfaction with Democracy
- Does Partisanship Affect Compliance with Government Recommendations? [europepmc]
- Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity. [europepmc]
- Online Intergroup Polarization Across Political Fault Lines: An Integrative Review. [europepmc]
- Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures. [europepmc]
- 'Them' without 'us': negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil. [europepmc]
- Group reciprocity and the evolution of stereotyping. [europepmc]
- Winning! Election returns and engagement in social media. [europepmc]
- Connecting groups and behaviours: A network analysis of identity-infused behaviours. [europepmc]
- Charting multidimensional ideological polarization across demographic groups in the USA. [europepmc]
Related