2016/08/30 by Daniel L. Fay, Staci M. Zavattaro · 82 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Social Sciences · #Brand management #Business #Context (archaeology) #Corporate Identity and Reputation #Corporate branding #Higher Education Governance and Development #Higher education #Isomorphism (crystallography) #Management and Organizational Studies #Marketing #Political science #Public relations
paper · open access · doi:10.1111/puar.12626
published in Public Administration Review 76(5), 805-815 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2016/08/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/11
Abstract Since the New Public Management movement began, public and nonprofit organizations have been adopting and adapting businesslike practices, including branding and marketing. There remains a knowledge gap in understanding why organizational actors choose to allocate resources to adopt branding and marketing policies. This article explores organizational branding initiatives within the context of research extensive (N = 109) higher education institutions in the United States from 2006 to 2013. Seventy‐two universities (66 percent) have introduced branding initiatives since 2006. Findings suggest that the publicness of organizations influences branding and marketing isomorphism in nuanced ways and that organizations are more likely to adopt new branding initiatives to promote higher general performance. Organizations adopt branding strategies in response to national trends and efforts to capitalize on their own strong performance rather than mimicking stronger‐performing peers .