Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms.

2011/05/31 by Anne M. Koenig, Alice H. Eagly, Abigail A. Mitchell +1 · 1,730 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Agency (philosophy) #Femininity #Gender Diversity and Inequality #Gender Roles and Identity Studies #Gender role #Gender schema theory #Masculinity #Psychology #Similarity (geometry) #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Social psychology #Sociology #Stereotype (UML)

paper · doi:10.1037/a0023557

published in Psychological Bulletin 137(4), 616-642 (American Psychological Association)

openalex publication_date 2011/05/31 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined the extent to which stereotypes of leaders are culturally masculine. The primary studies fit into 1 of 3 paradigms: (a) In Schein's (1973) think manager-think male paradigm, 40 studies with 51 effect sizes compared the similarity of male and leader stereotypes and the similarity of female and leader stereotypes; (b) in Powell and Butterfield's (1979) agency-communion paradigm, 22 studies with 47 effect sizes compared stereotypes of leaders' agency and communion; and (c) in Shinar's (1975) masculinity-femininity paradigm, 7 studies with 101 effect sizes represented stereotypes of leadership-related occupations on a single masculinity-femininity dimension. Analyses implemented appropriate random and mixed effects models. All 3 paradigms demonstrated overall masculinity of leader stereotypes: (a) In the think manager-think male paradigm, intraclass correlation = .25 for the women-leaders similarity and intraclass correlation = .62 for the men-leaders similarity; (b) in the agency-communion paradigm, g = 1.55, indicating greater agency than communion; and (c) in the masculinity-femininity paradigm, g = 0.92, indicating greater masculinity than the androgynous scale midpoint. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses indicated that this masculine construal of leadership has decreased over time and was greater for male than female research participants. In addition, stereotypes portrayed leaders as less masculine in educational organizations than in other domains and in moderate- than in high-status leader roles. This article considers the relation of these findings to Eagly and Karau's (2002) role congruity theory, which proposed contextual influences on the incongruity between stereotypes of women and leaders. The implications for prejudice against women leaders are also considered.

Citations

• Intersectionality and research in psychology.
• Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.

Cited by

• Goodbye, Gender Stereotypes? Trait Attributions to Politicians in 11 Years of News Coverage
• The Gendered Risks of Violating Expectations and the Importance of Information for Women Candidates
• Studying gender stereotypes of political candidates over four decades
• Nevertheless, Role Models Persisted: Girls Exposed To Women Politicians More Likely To Vote as Adults
• Thriving at Work: How a Paradox Mindset Influences Innovative Work Behavior
• Closing the Gender Gap in Internal Political Efficacy? Gender Roles and the Masculine Ethos of Politics in Spain
• Gendered Jobs and Local Leaders
• Diversity Incentives Can Increase Women’s Aspirations to Lead
• Competent and influential: how do voters evaluate women prime ministers?
• Women in the Global Super Rich. An Analysis of the Forbes World’s Billionaires List, 2010–2023
• Looks Like a Leader: Measuring Evolution in Gendered Politician Stereotypes
• The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics
• Cometh the hour, cometh the woman: Jacinda Ardern’s crisis leadership and issues of gender
• A ‘Presidential Look’? An Analysis of Gender Framing in 2016 Persuasive Memes of Hillary Clinton
• Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness
• We see symbols but not saviors: Women's representation and the political attitudes of working‐class women
• Gender, perceptions of benefits and costs, and negative campaigning. Evidence from German candidate surveys
• Stereotypes and biases in recruiting PhD holders: a professional profile experiment
• Candidate Evaluations Through the Lens of Adaptive Followership Psychology: How and Why Voters Prefer Leaders Based on Character Traits
• When women emerge as leaders: Effects of extraversion and gender composition in groups
• The structure and experience of interim roles in academic health sciences libraries
• Who makes AI? Gender and portrayals of AI scientists in popular film, 1920–2020
• ‘If they can lead, I can too’: supervisors, social comparisons and women’s leadership aspiration / ‘Si ellos pueden liderar’, yo también: superiores, comparación social y aspiración de liderazgo de las mujeres
• Anti-LGB Language
• Women and leadership: the approbation of women bosses by women subordinates
• Gender on the mind? Gender heuristics and rationalizations in candidate evaluations
• Gay and Straight Men Prefer Masculine-Presenting Gay Men for a High-Status Role: Evidence From an Ecologically Valid Experiment
• The bases of propriety: instrumental, relational, moral, and collective
• Pink and Blue Pixel: Gender and Economic Disparity in Two Massive Online Games
• Visual Information and Candidate Evaluations: The Influence of Feminine and Masculine Images on Support for Female Candidates
• Gender differences in leaders’ crisis communication: a sentiment-based analysis of German higher education leaderships’ online posts
• Too young to lead? Role incongruity explains age bias against young leaders
• Gender Bias in Leader Evaluations
• Don’t Pitch Like a Girl!: How Gender Stereotypes Influence Investor Decisions
• Charisma is a costly signal
• “Back to the Kitchen”: Corruption Charges Against Women Heads of Government
• Stereotypes versus preferences: Revisiting the role of alpha males in leadership
• Myths About Women in the Political Executive—How Gender Stereotypes Shape the Way MPs Assess the Competences of Ministers
• Gender stereotypes and workplace bias
• Gender Biases in (Inter) Action
• Successful female leaders empower women's behavior in leadership tasks
• Male Interviewers’ Nonverbal Dominance Predicts Lower Evaluations of Female Applicants in Simulated Job Interviews
• Smiling in a Job Interview: When Less Is More
• Visual Anthropomorphism Shifts Evaluations of Gendered AI Managers
• Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates
• Does Gender Matter? Female Representation on Corporate Boards and Firm Financial Performance - A Meta-Analysis
• Think talent – think male? A comparative case study analysis of gender inclusion in talent management practices in the German media industry
• U.S. masters track participation reveals a stable sex difference in competitiveness. [europepmc]
• Addressing Stereotype Threat is Critical to Diversity and Inclusion in Organizational Psychology. [europepmc]
• Advancing Women's Health and Women's Leadership With Endowed Chairs in Women's Health. [europepmc]
• Perceptions of Leadership: Comparing Canadian and Irish Physiotherapists' Views. [europepmc]
• Gay- and Lesbian-Sounding Auditory Cues Elicit Stereotyping and Discrimination. [europepmc]
• Leader evaluation and team cohesiveness in the process of team development: A matter of gender? [europepmc]
• Reasons behind current gender imbalances in senior global health roles and the practice and policy changes that can catalyze organizational change. [europepmc]
• Unnecessary Frills: Communality as a Nice (But Expendable) Trait in Leaders. [europepmc]
• What's in a Word? Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Leadership Language in Anesthesiology Resident Feedback. [europepmc]
• Are the Processes Underlying Discrimination the Same for Women and Men? A Critical Review of Congruity Models of Gender Discrimination. [europepmc]
• Overlooked Leadership Potential: The Preference for Leadership Potential in Job Candidates Who Are Men vs. Women. [europepmc]
• Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists. [europepmc]
• "Why Can't I Become a Manager?"-A Systematic Review of Gender Stereotypes and Organizational Discrimination. [europepmc]
• 'Gender is not even a side issue…it's a non-issue': career trajectories and experiences from the perspective of male and female healthcare managers in Kenya. [europepmc]
• Is the Distribution of Awards Gender-balanced in Orthopaedic Surgery Societies? [europepmc]
• The Future of Women in Psychological Science. [europepmc]
• The Glass Ceiling for Women Managers: Antecedents and Consequences for Work-Family Interface and Well-Being at Work. [europepmc]
• Gender of Award Recipients in Major Ophthalmology Societies. [europepmc]
• A Model for Strengthening Mentors: Frames and Practices. [europepmc]
• Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator. [europepmc]
• Equal Representation Does Not Mean Equal Opportunity: Women Academics Perceive a Thicker Glass Ceiling in Social and Behavioral Fields Than in the Natural Sciences and Economics. [europepmc]
• Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects. [europepmc]
• Gender bias in teaching evaluations: the causal role of department gender composition. [europepmc]
• Gender stereotypes in leadership: Analyzing the content and evaluation of stereotypes about typical, male, and female leaders. [europepmc]
• A systematic review of nudges on hand hygiene against the spread of COVID-19. [europepmc]

Related

• Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators.
• ‘Who’ Makes a ‘Good’ Leader? Examining the Influence of Leader Gender with Perceptions of Leader Competency and Employee Outcomes
• Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
• Don't rock the boat! Do men prefer women leaders who support the status quo?
• Gender Bias in Leader Evaluations