vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

A Comparison and Combination of Unsupervised Blind Source Separation Techniques

2021/06/10 by Boeddeker, Christoph, Frederik Rautenberg, Reinhold Haeb‐Umbach +2 · 1 citation
Computer Science · #Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS) #Blind Source Separation Techniques #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Electrical engineering #Music and Audio Processing #Sound (cs.SD) #Speech and Audio Processing #electronic engineering #information engineering

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.05627

openalex publication_date 2021/06/10 · openalex created_date 2021/06/22 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Unsupervised blind source separation methods do not require a training phase and thus cannot suffer from a train-test mismatch, which is a common concern in neural network based source separation. The unsupervised techniques can be categorized in two classes, those building upon the sparsity of speech in the Short-Time Fourier transform domain and those exploiting non-Gaussianity or non-stationarity of the source signals. In this contribution, spatial mixture models which fall in the first category and independent vector analysis (IVA) as a representative of the second category are compared w.r.t. their separation performance and the performance of a downstream speech recognizer on a reverberant dataset of reasonable size. Furthermore, we introduce a serial concatenation of the two, where the result of the mixture model serves as initialization of IVA, which achieves significantly better WER performance than each algorithm individually and even approaches the performance of a much more complex neural network based technique.

Citations

Cited by

Related