Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions
2012/09/28 by Claire A. Dunlop, Claudio M. Radaelli · 558 citations
Decision Sciences · Environmental Science · Mathematics · Social Sciences · #Artificial intelligence #Biology #Computer science #Data science #Economics #Epistemology #Evaluation and Performance Assessment #Field (mathematics) #Knowledge management #Machine learning #Management science #Mathematics #Monolith #Policy Transfer and Learning #Policy learning #Process (computing) #Sociology #Sustainability and Climate Change Governance #Typology
paper · open access · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00982.x
published in Political Studies 61(3), 599-619 (SAGE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2012/09/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06
Abstract
The field of policy learning is characterised by concept stretching and a lack of systematic findings. To systematise them, we combine the classic Sartorian approach to classification with the more recent insights on explanatory typologies, distinguishing between the genus and the different species within it. By drawing on the technique of explanatory typologies to introduce a basic model of policy learning, we identify four major genera in the literature. We then generate variation within each cell by using rigorous concepts drawn from adult education research. By looking at learning through the lenses of knowledge utilisation, we show that the basic model can be expanded to reveal sixteen different species. These types are all conceptually possible, but are not all empirically established in the literature. Our reconstruction of the field sheds light on mechanisms and relations associated with alternative operationalisations of learning and the role of actors in the process of knowledge construction and utilisation. By providing a comprehensive typology, we mitigate concept-stretching problems and lay the foundations for the systematic comparison across and within cases of policy learning.
Citations
Cited by
- Care at the Crossroads: How Policy Feedback Shaped Competing Feminist Advocacy for Parental Leave Reform in Spain
- Crisis micro‐learning: A framework for understanding the micro‐flow of policy learning and Australia's COVID‐19 response
- A Three‐Stage Model of the Maturation of Nascent Policy Subsystems Toward Stable Advocacy Coalitions, With Evidence From the UK 's Response to COVID ‐19
- Learning in polycentric governance: Insights from the California Delta science enterprise
- Learning to govern: A typology of ministerial learning styles
- Interlocal learning mechanisms and policy diffusion: The case of new energy vehicles finance in Chinese cities
- Tensions in transforming an innovation policy paradigm: contextual variation and reflexive governance
- Hello darkness my old friend: How policy learning can contribute to value destruction
- A matter of culture? Conceptualizing and investigating “Evidence Cultures” within research on evidence-informed policymaking
- Multilevel policy implementation and the where of learning: the case of the information system for school buildings in Italy
- Performance, Satisfaction, or Loss Aversion? A Meso–Micro Assessment of Local Commitments to Sustainability Programs
- What is successful policy experimentation?
- Policy beliefs, belief uncertainty, and policy learning through the lens of the Advocacy Coalition Framework
- Evidence for the future? Strategic foresight as a source of evidence for policymaking
- Capacity‐Learning Paradox: How Hong Kong and Singapore's Crisis Responses Shape and Are Shaped by Policy Capacities
- Blocked and “Unblocked” Learning: Structural Factors That Impede and Enable Evidence‐Informed Policymaking
- Interactive walkable floor maps as a science-policy-interface tool for nature-based solutions
- Adopting an Integrated Strategy in Local Policy Design: Agenda Content Diversity, Policy Capacities, and Policy Feedback Effects in Urban Policies as Multi‐Level Policy Mixes: The Urban Dimension of the European Union Cohesion Policy in Spain (1994–2020)
- Expert knowledge and policymaking: a multi-disciplinary research agenda
- Can Intergovernmental Learning Enhance Effectiveness? A New Perspective From Policy Uncertainty
- Policy Learning and Policy Analysis Within European Union Institutions: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda
- The Transactional Trajectories of Policy Solutions How French Government Domesticated the Shale Gas Problem and Its Owners
- Policy Learning and Adaptation in governance; a Co-evolutionary Perspective
- On the Applicability of the Advocacy Coalition Framework for Analyzing EU Policy Processes
- How does policy learning take place across a multilevel governance architecture during crises?
- Transfer and translation of policy
- Policy learning in the Eurozone crisis: modes, power and functionality. [europepmc]
- Learning for Universal Health Coverage. [europepmc]
- Environmental approaches to promote healthy eating: Is ensuring affordability and availability enough? [europepmc]
- Implementing Systemic Innovation Strategies for a More Sustainable Future: The Case of Three Overseas Countries and Territories. [europepmc]
- The COVID-19 exams fiasco across the UK: four nations and two windows of opportunity. [europepmc]
- Continuities and change in alcohol policy at the global level: a documentary analysis of the 2010 Global Strategy for Reducing the Harmful Use of Alcohol and the Global Alcohol Action Plan 2022-2030. [europepmc]
- Using a policy learning lens to understand health financing policy outcomes: the case of translating strategic health purchasing into policy and practice in Burkina Faso. [europepmc]
- Policymaking integration, policy coherence, and whole-of-government approaches: a qualitative systematic review of advice for policymakers. [europepmc]
- What determines the success or failure of policy experiments?-A qualitative field study of China's healthcare reform pilots. [europepmc]
- Junctures in the Time of Covid: Topic Search and Shifting Covid-19 Policy in the Philippines [europepmc]
Related