Global Health Security: Security for whom? Security from what?
2011/11/07 by Simon Rushton · 200 citations
Medicine · Social Sciences · #Cloud computing security #Corporate security #Critical security studies #Data-Driven Disease Surveillance #Economic growth #Economics #Global Security and Public Health #Global health #Health care #Health policy #Health security #International security #Law #Medicine #Network security policy #Political economy #Political science #Public administration #Public health #Public relations #Security studies #Sociology #Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
paper · open access · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00919.x
published in Political Studies 59(4), 779-796 (SAGE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2011/11/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Abstract
The concept of ‘health security’ has been increasingly apparent in recent years in both academic and policy discourses on transborder infectious disease threats. Yet it has been noted that there are a range of conceptualisations of ‘health security’ in circulation and that confusion over the concept is creating international tensions with some states (particularly from the Global South) fearing that ‘health security’ in reality means securing the West. This article examines these tensions but puts forward an alternative explanation for them. It begins by looking at the different ‘health securities' that characterise the contemporary global health discourse, arguing that there is in fact a good deal more consensus than we are often led to believe. In particular there is a high level of agreement evident over what the major threats to ‘health security’ are and what should be done about them. These are a particular set of health risks which are primarily seen as major threats by Western developed nations, and contemporary global responses – often couched in the language of global health security – have a tendency to focus on containment rather than prevention. The article makes the case that to resolve the tensions around (global) health security there is the need for a more explicit recognition of the primary beneficiaries of the current system, and of who is bearing the costs. Only following such a recognition can meaningful debates be carried out about the appropriate prioritisation of global health security in relation to other global health governance priorities.
Citations
Cited by
- Health security—Why is ‘public health’ not enough?
- Normative convergence between global health security and universal health coverage: a qualitative analysis of international health negotiations in the wake of COVID-19
- (Re)securitizing Food Policy in Vietnam: The Mekong Delta Plan and the Discourse Metamorphosis
- Governing health through security in the Philippines: a realist analysis
- When should a public health emergency of international concern be declared? The case of the 2018–2020 Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
- From global health security to global health solidarity, security and sustainability. [europepmc]
- Global Health in the Anthropocene: Moving Beyond Resilience and Capitalism Comment on "Health Promotion in an Age of Normative Equity and Rampant Inequality". [europepmc]
- Mapping global policy discourse on antimicrobial resistance. [europepmc]
- Global health security and universal health coverage: from a marriage of convenience to a strategic, effective partnership. [europepmc]
- Digital epidemiology and global health security; an interdisciplinary conversation. [europepmc]
- Where is the 'global' in the European Union's Health Research and Innovation Agenda? [europepmc]
- Cuba y seguridad sanitaria mundial: Cuba's role in global health security. [europepmc]
- Reconceptualising health security in post-COVID-19 world. [europepmc]
- Global health (security), immigration governance and Covid-19 in South(ern) Africa: An evolving research agenda. [europepmc]
- The emergence of post-Westphalian health governance during the Covid-19 pandemic: the European Health Union. [europepmc]
- COVAX, vaccine donations and the politics of global vaccine inequity. [europepmc]
- The role of health systems for health security: a scoping review revealing the need for improved conceptual and practical linkages. [europepmc]
- The Race for COVID-19 Vaccines: Accelerating Innovation, Fair Allocation and Distribution. [europepmc]
- The Pandemic Treaty, the Pandemic Fund, and the Global Commons: our scepticism. [europepmc]
- The biomedical securitization of global health. [europepmc]
- Retracing loss of momentum for primary health care: can renewed political interest in the context of COVID-19 be a turning point? [europepmc]
- The political economy of expedience: examining perspectives on military support to Sierra Leone's Ebola response. [europepmc]
- Examining the militarised hierarchy of Sierra Leone's Ebola response and implications for decision making during public health emergencies. [europepmc]
- HIV/AIDS, SARS, and COVID-19: the trajectory of China's pandemic responses and its changing politics in a contested world. [europepmc]
- Armed actor interventions in humanitarian and public health crises: examining perspectives of crisis-affected community members. [europepmc]
- Health security-Why is 'public health' not enough? [europepmc]
- Normative convergence between global health security and universal health coverage: a qualitative analysis of international health negotiations in the wake of COVID-19. [europepmc]
- Understanding the expectations, positions and ambitions of LMICs during pandemic treaty negotiations, and the factors contributing to them. [europepmc]
- How health securitisation shapes health system priorities: A realist synthesis. [europepmc]
- Governing health through security in the Philippines: a realist analysis. [europepmc]
Related