2025/01/10 by Malte Esders, Thomas Schnake, Jonas Lederer +4 · 1 voice · 13 citations
Computer Science · Materials Science · #Artificial intelligence #Artificial neural network #Biological system #Computational Drug Discovery Methods #Computer science #Machine Learning in Materials Science #Machine learning #Molecule #Physics #Quantum #Quantum chemical #Quantum mechanics #Set (abstract data type) #Statistical physics #Topic Modeling
paper · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01424
published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 21(2), 714-729 (American Chemical Society)
openalex publication_date 2025/01/10 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
While machine learning (ML) models have been able to achieve unprecedented accuracies across various prediction tasks in quantum chemistry, it is now apparent that accuracy on a test set alone is not a guarantee for robust chemical modeling such as stable molecular dynamics (MD). To go beyond accuracy, we use explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques to develop a general analysis framework for atomic interactions and apply it to the SchNet and PaiNN neural network models. We compare these interactions with a set of fundamental chemical principles to understand how well the models have learned the underlying physicochemical concepts from the data. We focus on the strength of the interactions for different atomic species, how predictions for intensive and extensive quantum molecular properties are made, and analyze the decay and many-body nature of the interactions with interatomic distance. Models that deviate too far from known physical principles produce unstable MD trajectories, even when they have very high energy and force prediction accuracy. We also suggest further improvements to the ML architectures to better account for the polynomial decay of atomic interactions.