Carbon majors and the scientific case for climate liability

2025/04/23 by Christopher W. Callahan, Justin Mankin, Justin S. Mankin · 5 voices · 5 citations
Environmental Science · Social Sciences · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Climate Change and Geoengineering #Environmental law and policy #Climate Change Policy and Economics

paper · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08751-3

Citations

• The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant

Cited by

• Quantifying climate loss and damage consistent with a social cost of carbon
• Climate determinism reborn
• Systematic attribution of heatwaves to the emissions of carbon majors
• Exploring the Viability of the Updated World3 Model for Examining the Impact of Computing on Planetary Boundaries
• Quantifying the regional to global climate impacts of individual fossil fuel projects to inform decision-making

Discussions

• A groundbreaking scientific framework seeks to hold fossil fuel companies legally responsible for specific climate impacts. Researchers Callahan & Mankin link major polluters' emissions directly to ec [bsky, 18 points, 1 comments]
• 🧪 "A transparent, reproducible and flexible framework that formalizes how end-to-end attribution could inform litigation by assessing whose emissions are responsible and for which harms." Carbon majo [bsky, 11 points, 0 comments]
• "Drawing quantitative linkages between individual emitters and particularized harms is now feasible, making science no longer an obstacle to the justiciability of climate liability claims." Carbon ma [bsky, 6 points, 1 comments]
• Source: doi.org/10.1038/s415... [bsky, 2 points, 0 comments]
• La publication originale : Christopher W. Callahan et Justin S. Mankin, « Carbon majors and the scientific case for climate liability », Nature, vol. 640, pp. 893–901 (2025) doi.org/10.1038/s415... [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]