vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-training

2025/01/28 by Tianzhe Chu, Chu, Tianzhe, Yuexiang Zhai +15 · 7 voices · 374 citations
Computer Science · Psychology · #Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning #Foundation (evidence) #Law #Mathematics education #Multimodal Machine Learning Applications #Physics #Political science #Psychology #Topic Modeling #Training (meteorology)

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.17161

published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University)

openalex publication_date 2025/01/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) are widely used post-training techniques for foundation models. However, their roles in enhancing model generalization capabilities remain unclear. This paper studies the difference between SFT and RL on generalization and memorization, focusing on text-based rule variants and visual variants. We introduce GeneralPoints, an arithmetic reasoning card game, and adopt V-IRL, a real-world navigation environment, to assess how models trained with SFT and RL generalize to unseen variants in both textual and visual domains. We show that RL, especially when trained with an outcome-based reward, generalizes across both rule-based textual and visual variants. SFT, in contrast, tends to memorize training data and struggles to generalize out-of-distribution scenarios. Further analysis reveals that RL improves the model's underlying visual recognition capabilities, contributing to its enhanced generalization in the visual domain. Despite RL's superior generalization, we show that SFT remains essential for effective RL training; SFT stabilizes the model's output format, enabling subsequent RL to achieve its performance gains. These findings demonstrates the capability of RL for acquiring generalizable knowledge in complex, multi-modal tasks.

Citations

Cited by

Discussions

Related