vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

High-Flow Oxygen Therapy During Exercise Training in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Hypoxemia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

2020/04/20 by Michele Vitacca, Mara Paneroni, Elisabetta Zampogna +19 · 33 citations
Medicine · #Blood pressure #COPD #Cardiovascular and exercise physiology #Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research #Heart rate #Hypoxemia #Internal medicine #Medicine #Oxygen therapy #Physical therapy #Pulmonary rehabilitation #Randomized controlled trial #Respiratory Support and Mechanisms #VO2 max

paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaa076

published in Physical Therapy 100(8), 1249-1259 (Oxford University Press)

openalex publication_date 2020/04/20 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate whether high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) during training was more effective than oxygen in improving exercise capacity in hypoxemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A total of 171 patients with COPD and chronic hypoxemia were consecutively recruited in 8 rehabilitation hospitals in a randomized controlled trial. Cycle-ergometer exercise training was used in 20 supervised sessions at iso inspiratory oxygen fraction in both groups. Pre- and post-training endurance time (Tlim), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), respiratory and limb muscle strength, arterial blood gases, Barthel Index, Barthel Dyspnea Index, COPD Assessment Test, Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: Due to 15.4% and 24.1% dropout rates, 71 and 66 patients were analyzed in HFOT and Venturi mask (V-mask) groups, respectively. Exercise capacity significantly improved after training in both groups with similar patient satisfaction. Between-group difference in post-training improvement in 6MWD (mean: 17.14 m; 95% CI = 0.87 to 33.43 m) but not in Tlim (mean: 141.85 seconds; 95% CI = -18.72 to 302.42 seconds) was significantly higher in HFOT. The minimal clinically important difference of Tlim was reached by 47% of patients in the V-mask group and 56% of patients in the HFOT group, whereas the minimal clinically important difference of 6MWD was reached by 51% of patients in the V-mask group and 69% of patients in the HFOT group, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with hypoxemic COPD, exercise training is effective in improving exercise capacity. IMPACT STATEMENT: The addition of HFOT during exercise training is not more effective than oxygen through V-mask in improving endurance time, the primary outcome, whereas it is more effective in improving walking distance.

Citations

Cited by

Related