2013/06/28 by Simon M. Huttegger · 2 citations
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · Computer Science · #Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics #Philosophy and Theoretical Science #Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
paper · doi:10.1086/671427
I discuss two ways of justifying reflection principles. First, I propose that an undogmatic reading of dynamic Dutch book arguments provides them with a sound foundation. Second, I show also that minimizing expected inaccuracy leads to a novel argument for reflection principles. The required inaccuracy measures comprise a natural class of functions that can be derived from a generalization of a condition known as propriety or immodesty. This shows that reflection principles are an essential feature not just of consistent degrees of belief but also of degrees of belief that approximate truth.