2022/02/24 by Ana Alonso-Curbelo · 18 citations
Social Sciences · #Ballot #CONTEST #Computer science #Democracy #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Elite #Framing (construction) #Law #Law in Society and Culture #Legislature #Parliament #Political economy #Political science #Politics #Polling #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Public administration #Sociology #Voting
paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/pa/gsac003
published in Parliamentary Affairs 76(1), 62-84 (Oxford University Press)
openalex publication_date 2022/02/24 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
Abstract In 2021, the Conservative UK government announced a proposal to introduce mandatory voter identification (ID) in elections, raising concerns around how these measures might disenfranchise already marginalised groups. Using computational content analysis techniques, this study analyses all parliamentary debates to date on voter ID to understand how political elites frame these requirements. Despite voter ID being justified as necessary to tackle voter fraud when the new Elections Bill was first announced, this study instead finds both Conservative and Labour Members of Parliament agree voter fraud numbers are small. Conservatives nevertheless significantly frame voter ID as necessary to strengthen public confidence in the electoral system, which contrasts Electoral Commission’s 2021 data instead finding 90% of the public consider voting to be safe from fraud at the polling station. Overall, this study sheds light to the ‘framing contest’ and polarisation present in parliamentary debates about voter ID, an increasingly contentious issue of the proposed Elections Bill.