How do Markov approximations compare with other methods for large spatial data sets?

2011/06/10 by Bolin, David, Lindgren, Finn
#Computation (stat.CO) #FOS: Computer and information sciences

paper · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1106.1980

Abstract

The Matérn covariance function is a popular choice for modeling dependence in spatial environmental data. Standard Matérn covariance models are, however, often computationally infeasible for large data sets. In this work, recent results for Markov approximations of Gaussian Matérn fields based on Hilbert space approximations are extended using wavelet basis functions. These Markov approximations are compared with two of the most popular methods for efficient covariance approximations; covariance tapering and the process convolution method. The results show that, for a given computational cost, the Markov methods have a substantial gain in accuracy compared with the other methods.

Related

• Which Parameterization of the Matérn Covariance Function?
• Fast covariance parameter estimation of spatial Gaussian process models\n using neural networks
• Unifying Compactly Supported and Matern Covariance Functions in Spatial Statistics
• Multivariate Matérn Models -- A Spectral Approach
• A diffusion-based spatio-temporal extension of Gaussian Matérn fields