2024/04/27 by John Beverley, Giacomo De Colle, Beverley, John +7 · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · #Architecture and Cultural Influences #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Databases (cs.DB) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.17757
openalex publication_date 2024/04/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Mid-level ontologies are used to integrate terminologies and data across disparate domains. There are, however, no clear, defensible criteria for determining whether a given ontology should count as mid-level, because we lack a rigorous characterization of what the middle level of generality is supposed to contain. Attempts to provide such a characterization have failed, we believe, because they have focused on the goal of specifying what is characteristic of those single ontologies that have been advanced as mid-level ontologies. Unfortunately, single ontologies of this sort are generally a mixture of top- and mid-level, and sometimes even of domain-level terms. To gain clarity, we aim to specify the necessary and sufficient conditions for a collection of one or more ontologies to inhabit what we call a mid-level architecture.