Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?

2000/03/01 by Sally Haslanger · 1 voice · 27 citations
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Language, Metaphor, and Cognition #Media, Communication, and Education #Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education

paper · doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00201

openalex publication_date 2000/03/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22

Citations

• Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis

Cited by

• Racism : Word, concept, and the pairing-dependence question
• You Think You Know Someone: Trans Identities and Epistemic Injustice
• Gender, Gender Expression, and the Dilemma of the Body
• Emancipatory Methodology
• Empirical evidence in conceptual engineering, or the defense of 'predictive understanding'
• The Complexity of Intersectionality
• Caste as a Social Kind
• Is it a tastytaste or a greedgrab? The importance of label choice in language design
• Back to Class: From Equality of Educational Opportunity to Social Equality
• Intersectionality without Fragmentation
• Over-intelligibility
• Polysemy and thought: Toward a generative theory of concepts
• Concepts in Context: Ontological Coherence in Political Science Research
• Bloße Streite um Worte
• The Folk Concept of Nursing in Australia: A Decolonising Conceptual Analysis
• Conceptual engineering: A road map to practice
• Transformative Transdisciplinarity
• After Metaethics
• Towards a two-factor approach to the cross-race effect
• ‘You're changing the subject’: An unfair objection to conceptual engineering?
• Sex Contextualism
• Two Types of Naturalism and the Metaphysics of Science
• Conceptual Engineering: Discontinuity and Individuation
• Existential Testimonial Injustice
• Conceptual Engineering Should be Empirical
• Changing “Sex”
• Modeling the Normativity of Joint Commitments

Discussions

• Haslanger, Sally. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?” doi.org/10.1111/0029.... Is a classic. I also use: Mallon, Ron. “A Field Guide to Social Construction.” doi.org/ [bsky, 2 points, 0 comments]