vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Correcting misinformation on social media with a large language model

2024/03/17 by Xinyi Zhou, Ashish Sharma, Zhou, Xinyi +5 · 2 voices · 4 citations
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Misinformation and Its Impacts #Spam and Phishing Detection #cs.AI #cs.CL

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.11169

openalex publication_date 2024/03/17 · arxiv published 2024/03/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · arxiv updated 2026/01/11 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Real-world information, often multimodal, can be misinformed or potentially misleading due to factual errors, outdated claims, missing context, misinterpretation, and more. Such "misinformation" is understudied, challenging to address, and harms many social domains -- particularly on social media, where it can spread rapidly. Manual correction that identifies and explains its (in)accuracies is widely accepted but difficult to scale. While large language models (LLMs) can generate human-like language that could accelerate misinformation correction, they struggle with outdated information, hallucinations, and limited multimodal capabilities. We propose MUSE, an LLM augmented with vision-language modeling and web retrieval over relevant, credible sources to generate responses that determine whether and which part(s) of the given content can be misinformed or potentially misleading, and to explain why with grounded references. We further define a comprehensive set of rubrics to measure response quality, ranging from the accuracy of identifications and factuality of explanations to the relevance and credibility of references. Results show that MUSE consistently produces high-quality outputs across diverse social media content (e.g., modalities, domains, political leanings), including content that has not previously been fact-checked online. Overall, MUSE outperforms GPT-4 by 37% and even high-quality responses from social media users by 29%. Our work provides a general methodological and evaluative framework for correcting misinformation at scale.

Cited by

Discussions

Related