The Role of Misconceptions in Support for Regressive Tax Reform

2006/03/01 by Joel Slemrod · 4 citations
Social Sciences · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth #Taxation and Compliance Studies

paper · doi:10.17310/ntj.2006.1.03

Abstract

In this paper, I use data from an exceptionally detailed survey of attitudes toward taxation in the United States to investigate the relative importance of one particular misconception—that high-income people would pay more tax under an apparently regressive reform, mostly because many people believe that the distribution of the burden of the existing income tax is regressive—in explaining public support for aflat tax and a retail sales tax. I find that this policy misconception is strongly associated with support for replacing the existing income tax with either of these two alternatives. A similar misconception about the distributional impact of the estate tax explains some of the support for eliminating that tax.

Cited by

• PERCEPTIONS AND REALITIES OF AVERAGE TAX RATES IN THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX
• Teaching Tax Brackets: Evidence From A Randomized Survey Experiment
• Taxed fairly? How differences in perception shape attitudes towards progressive taxation
• Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment

Related

• Taxed fairly? How differences in perception shape attitudes towards progressive taxation
• Taxation and Resentment: Race, Party, and Class in American Tax Attitudes <i>by Andrea Louise Campbell</i>
• PERCEPTIONS AND REALITIES OF AVERAGE TAX RATES IN THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX
• Empirical Evidence of the Changing Pattern of Personal Income Taxes Paid by Income Classes, 1951-1962
• Tax principles, policy feedback and self-interest: cross-national experimental evidence on wealth tax preferences