vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

The Electrical Structure of Two Supercell Storms during STEPS

2005/09/01 by Donald R. MacGorman, W. David Rust, P. R. Krehbiel +6 · 141 citations
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Environmental Science · Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy #Atmospheric electricity #Atmospheric sciences #Electric field #Environmental science #Fire effects on ecosystems #Geology #Graupel #Ice crystals #Lightning (connector) #Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena #Mesocyclone #Meteorology #Physics #Plant responses to water stress #Precipitation #Storm #Supercell #Thunderstorm

paper · doi:10.1175/mwr2994.1

published in Monthly Weather Review 133(9), 2583-2607 (American Meteorological Society)

openalex publication_date 2005/09/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/26

Abstract

Abstract Balloon soundings were made through two supercell storms during the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study (STEPS) in summer 2000. Instruments measured the vector electric field, temperature, pressure, relative humidity, and balloon location. For the first time, soundings penetrated both the strong updraft and the rainy downdraft region of the same supercell storm. In both storms, the strong updraft had fewer vertically separated charge regions than found near the rainy downdraft, and the updraft’s lowest charge was elevated higher, its bottom being near the 40-dBZ boundary of the weak-echo vault. The simpler, elevated charge structure is consistent with the noninductive graupel–ice mechanism dominating charge generation in updrafts. In the weak-echo vault, the amount of frozen precipitation and the time for particle interactions are too small for significant charging. Inductive charging mechanisms and lightning may contribute to the additional charge regions found at lower altitudes outside the updraft. Lightning mapping showed that the in-cloud channels of a positive ground flash could be in any one of the three vertically separated positive charge regions found outside the updraft, but were in the middle region, at 6–8 km MSL, for most positive ground flashes. The observations are consistent with the electrical structure of these storms having been inverted in polarity from that of most storms elsewhere. It is hypothesized that the observed inverted-polarity cloud flashes and positive ground flashes were caused by inverted-polarity storm structure, possibly due to a larger than usual rime accretion rate for graupel in a strong updraft.

Cited by

Related