2026/04/23 by Takumi Uchihara, Parveneh Tavakoli, Svetlana Mazhurnaya +1
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · #EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning #Second Language Acquisition and Learning #Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
paper · doi:10.1111/modl.70064
Abstract This study revisited the commonly held view that the use of multiword sequences (MWSs) is a reliable predictor of L2 speaking proficiency in monologue, by extending the investigation from monologic to dialogic speaking contexts. We accessed dialogic performance data from 127 test‐takers of the Test of English for Educational Purposes assessed at six different proficiency levels. The use of bigrams and trigrams was measured in terms of proportion, frequency, and association of strength. Results showed that none of the n ‐gram measures were associated with levels of speaking proficiency. When analysing pair‐level use of MWSs, the results of a linear mixed‐effects modeling suggested that pair‐level effects explained about 40% and 30% of the total variance for bigram and trigram proportion, respectively. Follow‐up analyses revealed that lower‐proficiency speakers in a nationality‐matched pair tended to produce a greater proportion of bigrams and trigrams than those in a nationality‐unmatched pair. These findings challenge the central role of MWSs documented in monologic task performance and suggest a complex interplay of phraseological competence and speaking performance when dialogic processing is considered.