2023/07/27 by Jarek Duda, Duda, Jarek · 1 citation
Computer Science · Physics and Astronomy · #FOS: Physical sciences #General Physics (physics.gen-ph) #Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture #Quantum Information and Cryptography #Quantum Mechanics and Applications
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.13522
openalex publication_date 2023/07/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Standard one-way quantum computers (1WQC) combine time symmetric unitary evolution, with asymmetric treatment of boundaries: state preparation allows to enforce a chosen initial state, however, for the final state measurement chooses a random value instead. As e.g. pull/push, negative/positive pressure, stimulated emission/absorption causing deexcitation/excitation are CPT analogs, and one can be used for state preparation, the second should allow for its CPT analog, referred here as CPT(state preparation) - allowing for additional chosen enforcement of the final state, its more active treatment than measurement. It should act similarly to postselection, but through applied physical constraints (instead of running multiple times). Like pumped to |1⟩ prepared state vs its "unpumped" ⟨ 0| CPT analog, hopefully allowing to construct two-way quantum computers (2WQC) e.g. hydrodynamical, and hopefully photonic: seen as ⟨ Φ_\textrmfinal|U_\textrmquantum gates|Φ_\textrminitial⟩ like for scattering matrix, with influenced both initial and final states. If possible, for example for an instance of 3-SAT problem on n variables, we could prepare ensemble of 2n inputs with Hadamard gates, calculate 3-SAT alternatives for them, and use CPT(state preparation) to enforce outcomes of all these alternatives to '1'. This way hopefully restricting this ensemble to satisfying given 3-SAT problem: ∑_a:\textrmSAT(a) |a⟩, in theory allowing to attack NP problems by simultaneously pushing and pulling information through the system for better control.