Ross-style Pluralism versus Rule-consequentialism

1996/10/01 by B. HOOKER, Brad Hooker · 2 citations
Psychology · Neuroscience · Arts and Humanities · #Philosophy and Theoretical Science #Free Will and Agency #Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

paper · doi:10.1093/mind/105.420.531

Abstract

Journal Article Ross-style Pluralism versus Rule-consequentialism Get access BRAD HOOKER BRAD HOOKER Philosophy Department, The University of Reading Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AA, UK [email protected] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mind, Volume 105, Issue 420, , Pages 531–552, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/105.420.531 Published: 01 January 1996

Cited by

• ‘Utilitarianism for animals: deontology for people’ and the doing/allowing distinction
• Enduring Objections to Actual Rule Consequentialism

Related

• Virtue & Pluralism: The Problem of the One & the Many
• Bradley's Regress, The Copula and the Unity of the Proposition
• Partiality, Favouritism and Morality
• Some Question-Begging Objections to Rule Consequentialism
• MODERATE MORALISM VERSUS MODERATE AUTONOMISM