2023/03/14 by Georgia Papadogeorgou, Papadogeorgou, Georgia, Srijata Samanta +1 · 7 citations
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Mathematics · #Advanced Causal Inference Techniques #Economic and Environmental Valuation #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Methodology (stat.ME) #Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08218
openalex publication_date 2023/03/14 · openalex created_date 2023/03/18 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
This manuscript unites causal inference and spatial statistics, presenting novel insights for causal inference in spatial data analysis, and drawing from tools in spatial statistics to estimate causal effects. We introduce spatial causal graphs to highlight that spatial confounding and interference can be entangled, in that investigating the presence of one can lead to wrongful conclusions in the presence of the other. Moreover, we show that spatial dependence in the exposure variable can render standard analyses invalid. To remedy these issues, we propose a Bayesian parametric approach based on tools commonly-used in spatial statistics. This approach simultaneously accounts for interference and mitigates bias from local and neighborhood unmeasured spatial confounding. From a Bayesian perspective, we show that incorporating an exposure model is necessary. Under a specific model formulation, we prove that all parameters are identifiable including the causal effects, even in the presence of unmeasured confounding. We illustrate the approach with a simulation study. We evaluate the effect of local and neighboring sulfur dioxide emissions from power plants on county-level cardiovascular mortality from observational spatial data in the United States, where unmeasured spatial confounding and interference might be present simultaneously.