2018/08/02 by James A. Piazza, James A Piazza, Seung-Whan Choi · 45 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance #Criminology #Development economics #Economics #International relations #Law #Political Conflict and Governance #Political economy #Political science #Politics #Psychological intervention #Psychology #Socioeconomic status #Sociology #Terrorism #Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
paper · doi:10.1093/isq/sqy026
published in International Studies Quarterly 62(3), 686-695 (Oxford University Press)
openalex publication_date 2018/08/02 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25
Are states that engage in foreign military interventions vulnerable to subsequent transnational terrorist attacks? If so, do all types of foreign interventions stimulate terrorism? Using data on international military interventions for 125 to 182 countries during the period from 1970 to 2005, we demonstrate that states experience more terrorism after they engage in military interventions. In particular, politico-strategic use of military force abroad—for example, interference in another country's domestic disputes, territorial interventions, or interventions to affect local politics and policy—leads to increased subsequent transnational terrorist attacks for the intervener. In contrast, socioeconomic foreign military interventions, such as those geared toward providing humanitarian relief, protecting social groups, or securing economic interests, do not lead to an increase in transnational terrorist attacks against intervening states.