2025/12/24 by Jacob C Bowman, Amber L. Fedus, Michael G. Fox +1
Environmental Science · #Fish Ecology and Management Studies #Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies #Marine and fisheries research
paper · doi:10.1093/tafafs/vnaf057
ABSTRACT Objective Remote underwater video (RUV) is a noninvasive survey technique that has long been used in marine ecosystems and is now gaining interest among freshwater fisheries scientists. Our objective was to test the efficacy of RUV for assessing fish species richness and abundance in the littoral zone of two water bodies in central Ontario, Canada. Methods With 133 deployments, we used RUV, minnow traps, snorkel surveys, and beach seine netting (the latter in river sites only) to survey fish assemblages and compared their estimates of species richness using species accumulation curves and generalized linear models. We compared maxN (a conservative estimate of abundance from RUV) to estimates of fish density from seine netting. Results We found that RUV estimated similar or higher species richness when compared with minnow traps and snorkeling but underestimated species richness relative to seine netting, which captured several uncommon small-bodied fishes that RUV failed to detect. The maxN was correlated with density estimates from seine netting for only 4 out of 11 species and life stages, suggesting that maxN is only a useful index of abundance for some species. Remote underwater video was sufficiently sensitive to detect a major interannual change in abundance of the invasive Round Goby Neogobius melanostomus, but the magnitude of change was much lower than the increase in density estimated by seine netting. Conclusions Collectively, the data reported here suggest that RUV is a useful tool, especially when used in conjunction with other methods or where other fisheries survey methods (e.g., electrofishing and netting) are not possible, such as for community groups interested in developing their own monitoring programs.