1968/10/01 by R. Seed · 5 citations
Environmental Science · Agricultural and Biological Sciences · #Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies #Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior #Mollusks and Parasites Studies
paper · doi:10.1017/s0025315400019159
An attempt is made to explain the great variations in gross shell morphology noted in field populations of Mytilus edulis . In any one mussel population, variation in shell form can be attributed to differences in age, old mussels having proportionately heavier shells where width often exceeds shell height. This is invariably accompanied by down-turned, divergent umbones and varying degrees of incurvature of the ventral shell margin. Variations in the age structure of mussel populations from different habitats can also account for local variability in shell morphology. Localities where the life expectancy of mussels is increased due to absence of predators (especially in the upper shore) reveal a high incidence of old ‘ungulate’ individuals, whereas populations in which the mussel turnover is more rapid show a preponderance of relatively young mussels. Shell morphology is greatly influenced by growth rate and density. These probably exert their effect through physical compression which is maximum in localities of fast growth and high density and least in areas of slow growth and low density. High compression leads to an elongate form whereas low compression results in higher, more triangular shaped shells. Growth rates and densities, even within the same habitat, are, however, exceedingly variable. Since all environmental conditions vary in both time and space, wide variation in shell morphology is to be expected, even in animals from the same locality. Transplantation experiments indicate that variation in shell morphology is essentially phenotypic, older animals being more likely to exhibit a form which is characteristic of their particular habitat. Smaller mussels from widely different habitats show remarkable similarity in shell morphology.