2008/03/31 by Daniel Labardini-Fragoso · 116 citations
Mathematics · #Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics #Algebraic structures and combinatorial models #Cluster (spacecraft) #Geometric and Algebraic Topology #Ideal (ethics) #Point set triangulation #Surface (topology) #Triangulation #math.RT #msc:16G99 #msc:16S99 #msc:57M50 #msc:57N05
paper · pdf · doi:10.1112/plms/pdn051
published in Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 98(3), 797-839 (Wiley) · v3: 44 pages, 57 figures. Prop 29 of v2 generalized to Thm 36, some changes to References. In response to referee's comments: some examples added, more cases verified in proof of Thm 30 (formerly Thm 23). Submitted to Proc. London Math. Soc
arxiv created 2008/08/11 · openalex publication_date 2008/11/14 · arxiv updated 2014/02/26 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We attempt to relate two recent developments: cluster algebras associated to triangulations of surfaces by Fomin–Shapiro–Thurston, and quivers with potentials (QPs) and their mutations introduced by Derksen–Weyman–Zelevinsky. To each ideal triangulation of a bordered surface with marked points, we associate a QP, in such a way that whenever two ideal triangulations are related by a flip of an arc, the respective QPs are related by a mutation with respect to the flipped arc. We prove that if the surface has non-empty boundary, then the QPs associated to its triangulations are rigid and hence non-degenerate.