Some further comments on the paper "biparametric scale adaptive filter design" for the detection of compact sources as proposed by M. Lopez-Caniego et. al 2005, MNRAS 359, 993

2005/10/17 by R. Vio, Vio, R., P. Andreani +1
Computer Science · Earth and Planetary Sciences · Engineering · Physics and Astronomy · #Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows #Astrophysics (astro-ph) #FOS: Physical sciences #Speech and Audio Processing #Underwater Acoustics Research #astro-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0510477

arxiv created 2005/10/17 · openalex publication_date 2005/10/17 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

In this note we re-propose the arguments presented in Vio (2005) examining the superiority of the 'bi-parametric scale adaptive filter' (BSAF) when dealing with source detection as claimed by (Lopez-Caniego 2005a) and confirmed in Lopez-Caniego (2005b). We suggest here that the dispute can be easily solved if these authors provide the community with a detailed derivation of a basic equation.

Citations

• Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory

Related

• Some comments on the paper "Filter design for the detection of compact sources based on the Neyman-Pearson detector" by M. Lopez-Caniego et. al (2005, MNRAS 359, 993)
• Some comments on the note "Some comments on the paper 'Filter design for the detection of compact sources based on the Neyman-Pearson detector' by M. Lopez-Caniego et. al (2005, MNRAS 359, 993)" by R. Vio and P. Andreani (astroph/0509394)
• The Dynamical Behavior of Detected vs. Undetected Targets
• MF is always superior to CEM
• The basic equation for target detection in remote sensing