2009/10/02 by H. B. Nielsen, Holger B. Nielsen, Nielsen, Holger B. +2 · 2 citations
Computer Science · Physics and Astronomy · Social Sciences · #Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems #FOS: Physical sciences #General Physics (physics.gen-ph) #High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph) #International Science and Diplomacy #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #hep-ph #physics.gen-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0910.0359
13 pages; a reference corrected; v3:typos in title page fixed
openalex publication_date 2009/10/02 · arxiv created 2009/10/23 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
We argue that a restriction determined by a drawn card or quantum random numbers, on the running of LHC (Large Hadron Collider), which was proposed in earlier articles by us, can only result in an, at first, apparent success whatever the outcome. This previous work was concerned with looking for backward causation and/or influence from the future, which, in our previous model, was assumed to have the effect of arranging bad luck for large Higgs producing machines, such as LHC and the never finished SSC (Superconducting Super Collider) stopped by Congress because of such bad luck, so as not to allow them to work.