2015/01/25 by László Martinek, Martinek, Laszlo, Miklós Arató +3
Decision Sciences · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Social Sciences · #62P05 #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Insurance and Financial Risk Management #Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management #Methodology (stat.ME) #Probability and Risk Models
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1501.06155
openalex publication_date 2015/01/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
The appropriate estimation of incurred but not reported (IBNR) reserves is traditionally one of the most important task of actuaries working in casualty and property insurance. As certain claims are reported many years after their occurrence, the amount and appropriateness of the reserves has a strong effect on the results of the institution. In recent years, stochastic reserving methods had become increasingly widespread. The topic has a wide actuarial literature, describing development models and evaluation techniques. We only mention the summarizing article \citeEV2002 and book \citeMV2008. The cardinal aim of our present work is the comparison of appropriateness of several stochastic estimation methods, supposing different distributional development models. We view stochastic reserving as a stochastic forecast, so using the comparison techniques developed for stochastic forecasts, namely scores, is natural, see \citeGT2007, for instance. We expect that in some cases this attitude will be more informative than the classical mean square error of prediction measure.