1999/08/24 by J. M. Wills, P. H. Andersson, Wills, J. M. +7
Physics and Astronomy · #FOS: Physical sciences #Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci) #cond-mat.mtrl-sci
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/9908344
8 pages, 3 figures, submitted to Phys. Rev. B
arxiv created 1999/08/24 · arxiv updated 2009/11/30
In a recent paper by Jones et al., it is argued, based on FP-LAPW band-structure calculations, that previous calculations of ground-state properties for actinides, using the FP-LMTO method implemented by J. M. Wills, are in error. We demonstrate in this paper that the conclusions of Jones et. al. are unfounded. Calculations using the FP-LMTO method are compared with calculations performed with the FP-LAPW method and, in contradiction to statements by Jones et. al., they agree very well. The limitation of the present implementation of the spin-orbit coupling is discussed, where especially the 6p states pose a difficulty. The observed discrepancy (0-10%) between the FP-LMTO calculations and the recent FP-LAPW calculation of Jones et. al. is shown to be due to the choice of muffin-tin radius in the calculations. We argue that the choice of a constant muffin-tin radius, common for all calculated volumes, is less satisfactory compared to the choice of a muffin-tin radius that scales with the volume, especially when a large volume interval and open packed structures are considered. The conclusion of Jones et al. that alpha-Pu has partially delocalized 5f electrons is argued to be erroneous.