2025/08/04 by Achim Goerres, Jonas Elis, Sabrina Jasmin Mayer · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #Demographic economics #Economics #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Federal election #Geography #German #Immigration #Law #Migration, Refugees, and Integration #Political economy #Political science #Politics #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Sociology
paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/01402382.2025.2524879
published in West European Politics, 1-26 (Taylor & Francis)
openalex publication_date 2025/08/04 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
In many European countries, voters of immigrant origin show lower levels of electoral mobilisation than native voters. This article presents a novel and probability-based panel survey conducted during the 2021 Bundestag election campaign in Duisburg, a major German city, in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. The survey includes both immigrant-origin and native German citizens and additional contextual data from respondents’ countries of origin, administrative city boroughs and the election campaign. Three core indicators of electoral mobilisation are examined: political interest, propensity to vote and perceived ease of voting. The article traces group differences between immigrant-origin and native voters across three phases of the political life cycle: during the time of politically coming of age, resource accumulation (through education and employment), and pre-election mobilisation. The findings highlight persistent gaps in mobilisation between immigrant-origin and native voters with the former being disadvantaged at all three phases, and call for a theoretical framework that integrates voters of all backgrounds, rather than treating immigrant-origin voters as an exceptional case.