2025/02/09 by Vilde Lunnan Djuve, Carl Henrik Knutsen · 2 voices · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Democracy #Democratization #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Elite #Law #Mass mobilization #Mobilization #Opposition (politics) #Political Conflict and Governance #Political economy #Political science #Politics #Politics and Society in Latin America #Regime change #Salient #Sociology #Status quo
paper · doi:10.1177/00220027251318938
published in Journal of Conflict Resolution 69(10), 1798-1826 (SAGE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2025/02/09 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/15
The mobilization of opposition mass movements may spur regime change via different processes, including popular revolutions or coups. We zoom in on one salient channel through which mass mobilization may induce regime change, namely via provoking incumbent responses. Synthesizing different arguments, we detail how incumbent elites sometimes preemptively alter the regime to diffuse threats by incumbent-guided democratization or by using opposition mobilization as windows of opportunity to transform the regime into one they prefer over the status quo (e.g., via self-coups). We combine data on opposition campaigns with detailed data on modes of regime breakdown and find that, overall, sustained mass movements are clearly associated with subsequent incumbent-led transitions. When disaggregating, violent movements typically precede only non-liberalizing transitions. In contrast, nonviolent movements are associated with all incumbent-led transitions, including democratizing ones. Thus, nonviolence is a key component in many successful campaigns for democracy, also absent full-fledged revolutions.