2025/01/01 by Vı́ctor de Lorenzo, Paul B. Rainey, Paul Williams +4 · 1 voice · 4 citations
Decision Sciences · #Academic Publishing and Open Access #Accreditation #Best practice #Credibility #Publishing #Quality (philosophy) #Reliability (semiconductor) #Safeguard #Storm
paper · doi:10.1093/femsml/uqaf029
published in microLife 6, uqaf029 (Oxford University Press)
openalex publication_date 2025/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/12 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Scientific publishing faces a credibility crisis driven to a very large extent by predatory journals, paper mills, and exploitative open-access (OA) practices. Structural pressures-publish-or-perish culture, mandatory OA policies, and author publication charges-driven business models-fuel the proliferation of low-quality or fraudulent research, now exacerbated by artificial intelligence-generated content. This opinion, which aligns with a growing clamour from the research community-calls for an international journal accreditation system, guided by a transparent code of conduct and enforced by funding agencies, to restore integrity, prioritize quality over quantity for professional progression, and safeguard trust in scientific communication.