2026/04/01 by Lasse Egendal Leipziger, Laurits Florang Aarslew, Matias Engdal Christensen · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies #Social Power and Status Dynamics
paper · doi:10.1093/poq/nfag029
Abstract Macro-level research finds that group-based inequalities are more likely than interpersonal inequalities to spark political conflict and instability. However, the individual-level mechanisms driving this relationship remain empirically underexamined. We test the central hypothesis that group-based disparities evoke stronger feelings and perceptions of injustice than interpersonal inequalities. Drawing on three preregistered priming experiments among disadvantaged groups in India (n = 1,600), South Africa (n = 1,600), and the United States (n = 3,000), we find limited evidence that intergroup inequality is perceived as more unfair and evokes stronger feelings of injustice than interpersonal inequality. Our findings question the view that ethnic inequalities are perceived as particularly unfair at the individual level, suggesting that their link to conflict may instead operate through other micro-level mechanisms.