2013/04/08 by Chandra Chekuri, Chekuri, Chandra, Anastasios Sidiropoulos +1
Computer Science · #Advanced Graph Theory Research #Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs #Computational Geometry (cs.CG) #Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation #Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS) #FOS: Computer and information sciences
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1304.2416
openalex publication_date 2013/04/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
The Euler genus of a graph is a fundamental and well-studied parameter in graph theory and topology. Computing it has been shown to be NP-hard by [Thomassen '89 & '93], and it is known to be fixed-parameter tractable. However, the approximability of the Euler genus is wide open. While the existence of an O(1)-approximation is not ruled out, only an O(sqrt(n))-approximation [Chen, Kanchi, Kanevsky '97] is known even in bounded degree graphs. In this paper we give a polynomial-time algorithm which on input a bounded-degree graph of Euler genus g, computes a drawing into a surface of Euler genus poly(g, log(n)). Combined with the upper bound from [Chen, Kanchi, Kanevsky '97], our result also implies a O(n^(1/2 - alpha))-approximation, for some constant alpha>0. Using our algorithm for approximating the Euler genus as a subroutine, we obtain, in a unified fashion, algorithms with approximation ratios of the form poly(OPT, log(n)) for several related problems on bounded degree graphs. These include the problems of orientable genus, crossing number, and planar edge and vertex deletion problems. Our algorithm and proof of correctness for the crossing number problem is simpler compared to the long and difficult proof in the recent breakthrough by [Chuzhoy 2011], while essentially obtaining a qualitatively similar result. For planar edge and vertex deletion problems our results are the first to obtain a bound of form poly(OPT, log(n)). We also highlight some further applications of our results in the design of algorithms for graphs with small genus. Many such algorithms require that a drawing of the graph is given as part of the input. Our results imply that in several interesting cases, we can implement such algorithms even when the drawing is unknown.