1995/04/01 by Louise F. Fitzgerald, Suzanne C. Swan, Suzanne Swan +1 · 361 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Assertiveness #Clinical psychology #Context (archaeology) #Coping (psychology) #Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis #Criminology #Harassment #Legal Issues in Education #Psychology #Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies #Social psychology
paper · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01312.x
published in Journal of Social Issues 51(1), 117-138 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 1995/04/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
The last few years have seen an increasing awareness of sexual harassment as an important social problem with serious implications for individuals and organizations alike, leading to increased attempts to understand how victims respond to this stressful and sometimes traumatic experience. The present article reviews the behavioral science research on responses to sexual harassment, including their links to outcomes and consequences. We then present an alternative to the frequently invoked assertiveness paradigm, derived from the cognitive‐behavioral stress and coping framework. We examine our paradigm in the context of legal proceedings that, in effect, hold the victim responsible for responding appropriately; explore the more general implications of placing the burden of noncom‐sent on the victim; and conclude with a discussion of this research for an emerging legal theory of sexual harassment.