vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

PerturBench: Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for Cellular Perturbation Analysis

2024/08/20 by Yan Wu, Wu, Yan, Esther Wershof +18 · 1 voice · 16 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Computer Science · Mathematics · #Cell Image Analysis Techniques #FOS: Biological sciences #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Genomics (q-bio.GN) #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #cs.LG #q-bio.GN #stat.ML

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.10609

openalex publication_date 2024/08/20 · arxiv published 2024/08/20 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · arxiv updated 2025/10/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We introduce a comprehensive framework for modeling single cell transcriptomic responses to perturbations, aimed at standardizing benchmarking in this rapidly evolving field. Our approach includes a modular and user-friendly model development and evaluation platform, a collection of diverse perturbational datasets, and a set of metrics designed to fairly compare models and dissect their performance. Through extensive evaluation of both published and baseline models across diverse datasets, we highlight the limitations of widely used models, such as mode collapse. We also demonstrate the importance of rank metrics which complement traditional model fit measures, such as RMSE, for validating model effectiveness. Notably, our results show that while no single model architecture clearly outperforms others, simpler architectures are generally competitive and scale well with larger datasets. Overall, this benchmarking exercise sets new standards for model evaluation, supports robust model development, and furthers the use of these models to simulate genetic and chemical screens for therapeutic discovery.

Cited by

Discussions

Related