vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

2009/04/21 by Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt, Brian A. Nosek · 4,628 citations
Neuroscience · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Cultural Differences and Values #Epistemology #Foundation (evidence) #Harm #Ingroups and outgroups #Law #Loyalty #Moral development #Moral disengagement #Moral psychology #Moral reasoning #Morality #Normative #Psychology #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment #Reciprocity (cultural anthropology) #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Social cognitive theory of morality #Social psychology #Sociology #Taboo

paper · doi:10.1037/a0015141

published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5), 1029-1046 (American Psychological Association)

openalex publication_date 2009/04/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06

Abstract

How and why do moral judgments vary across the political spectrum? To test moral foundations theory (J. Haidt & J. Graham, 2007; J. Haidt & C. Joseph, 2004), the authors developed several ways to measure people's use of 5 sets of moral intuitions: Harm/care, Fairness/reciprocity, Ingroup/loyalty, Authority/respect, and Purity/sanctity. Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally. This difference was observed in abstract assessments of the moral relevance of foundation-related concerns such as violence or loyalty (Study 1), moral judgments of statements and scenarios (Study 2), "sacredness" reactions to taboo trade-offs (Study 3), and use of foundation-related words in the moral texts of religious sermons (Study 4). These findings help to illuminate the nature and intractability of moral disagreements in the American "culture war."

Citations

Cited by

Related