2013/01/11 by Tim Cochran, Tim D. Cochran, Bridget D. Franklin +4 · 1 citation
Mathematics · #Geometric and Algebraic Topology #Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology #Advanced Operator Algebra Research
paper · pdf · doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-2013-11471-1
We consider the question: “If the zero-framed surgeries on two oriented knots in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper S cubed"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msup> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">S3</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> are <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper Z"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb Z</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -homology cobordant, preserving the homology class of the positive meridians, are the knots themselves concordant?” We show that this question has a negative answer in the smooth category, even for topologically slice knots. To show this we first prove that the zero-framed surgery on <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper Z"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">Z</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb Z</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -homology cobordant to the zero-framed surgery on many of its winding number one satellites <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper P left-parenthesis upper K right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">P(K)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . Then we prove that in many cases the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="tau"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> τ </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">τ</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="s"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">s</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -invariants of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> and <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper P left-parenthesis upper K right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">P(K)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> differ. Consequently neither <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="tau"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> τ </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">τ</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> nor <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="s"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">s</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is an invariant of the smooth homology cobordism class of the zero-framed surgery. We also show that a natural rational version of this question has a negative answer in both the topological and smooth categories by proving similar results for <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> and its <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="left-parenthesis p comma 1 right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">(p,1)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -cables.