2025/05/29 by Mohamed Elaraby, Elaraby, Mohamed, Diane Litman +1
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Artificial Intelligence in Law #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation #Topic Modeling
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23654
openalex publication_date 2025/05/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
We introduce Argument Representation Coverage (ARC), a bottom-up evaluation framework that assesses how well summaries preserve salient arguments, a crucial issue in summarizing high-stakes domains such as law. ARC provides an interpretable lens by distinguishing between different information types to be covered and by separating omissions from factual errors. Using ARC, we evaluate summaries from eight open-weight large language models in two domains where argument roles are central: long legal opinions and scientific articles. Our results show that while these models capture some salient roles, they frequently omit critical information, particularly when arguments are sparsely distributed across the input. Moreover, ARC uncovers systematic patterns, showing how context window positional bias and role-specific preferences shape argument coverage, and provides actionable guidance for developing more complete and reliable summarization strategies.