2023/11/24 by Jan Feld, Corinna Lines, Libby J. Ross · 3 voices · 4 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Decision Sciences · Psychology · #Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance #Epistemology #Philosophy #Psychology #Quality (philosophy) #Sociology #scientometrics and bibliometrics research
paper · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.11.016
published in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 217, 378-397 (Elsevier BV)
openalex publication_date 2023/11/24 · openalex created_date 2023/11/25 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
For papers to have scientific impact, they need to impress our peers in their role as referees, journal editors, and members of conference committees. Does better writing help our papers make it past these gatekeepers? In this study, we estimate the effect of writing quality by comparing how 30 economists judge the quality of papers written by PhD students in economics. Each economist judged five papers in their original version and five different papers that had been language edited. No economist saw both versions of the same paper. Our results show that writing matters. Compared to the original versions, economists judge edited versions as higher quality; they are more likely to accept edited versions for a conference; and they believe that edited versions have a better chance of being accepted at a good journal.