2025/06/19 by Yemisi Bolumole, Jason Miller, Chinedu Ufodike · 6 citations
paper · doi:10.1111/jbl.70025
published in Journal of Business Logistics 46(3) (Wiley)
crossref issued 2025/06/19 · crossref published 2025/06/19 · crossref published-online 2025/06/19 · crossref created 2025/06/19 · crossref published-print 2025/07/01 · crossref deposited 2025/12/08 · crossref indexed 2026/08/05
ABSTRACT New institutional theory (NIT) suggests that coercive policy mandates will yield relatively homogenous compliance behaviors, stemming from the assumption of a single powerful regulatory body. Furthermore, research examining temporal dynamics within NIT assumes firms will quickly comply in these environments. However, a nascent stream of research suggests these assumptions insufficiently account for regulatory environments that are subject to policy enforcement uncertainty. We contribute to programmatic theory concerning NIT by examining firms' responses to coercive yet heterogeneous regulatory environments by studying small‐ and medium‐sized trucking firms' compliance behaviors during a unique natural experiment where some US states postponed enforcement of the electronic logging device (ELD) mandate in the US trucking sector. We find that while firms located in states that postponed enforcement deadlines experienced lower compliance efforts regarding the ELD mandate prior to the initial enforcement date, the impact of being in a postponed enforcement environment became less pronounced once other states began enforcement efforts. Results also reinforce the dominant role of firm size in shaping compliance behaviors, with larger‐sized firms being less responsive to environmental heterogeneity. Results suggest a new boundary conditions for NIT and help inform the supply chain management literature on how firms respond to policy mandates.