vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Neuroscience undermines the higher-order theorists’ preferred solution to the targetless HOT problem

2026/02/15 by Benjamin Kozuch · 2 voices
Neuroscience · #Action (physics) #Cognitive neuroscience #Functional Brain Connectivity Studies #Memory and Neural Mechanisms #Motivated reasoning #Neural dynamics and brain function #Neuroeconomics #Qualia

paper · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2629514

published in Philosophical Psychology, 1-28 (Taylor & Francis)

openalex publication_date 2026/02/15 · openalex created_date 2026/02/17 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/15

Abstract

The Higher-Order Theory (HOT) of consciousness holds that mental states become conscious when they are represented by another mental state. Most HOT theorists maintain that it is the higher-order, rather than the lower-order, state that supplies the content of conscious experience. This view entails that, for a state to become conscious, its content must be represented in the brain regions that produce higher-order states, which are widely thought to be in the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC). This article argues that this creates a challenge for HOT: current neuroimaging evidence and functional considerations suggest that, if PFC activity is constitutive of consciousness, it enables the consciousness of content represented in visual areas rather than supplying the content itself. The conclusion will be that HOT research should focus more on developing the version in which the first-order state supplies the content of visual experience.

Citations

Discussions

Related