2015/01/28 by Anthony Ruffus, Jon McGinnis · 46 citations
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · #Medieval and Classical Philosophy #Families in Therapy and Culture #Islamic Thought and Society Studies #Action (physics) #Epistemology #Philosophy #Philosophical theory #Philosophical analysis #Philosophical methodology #Physics
paper · doi:10.1515/agph-2015-0007
published in Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 97(2) (De Gruyter)
openalex publication_date 2015/01/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
Abstract: In this study, we look at two interpretive puzzles associated with the thought of Avicenna that are still of intrinsic philosophical interest today. The first concerns to what extent, if at all, Avicenna’s deity can be said to act freely. The second concerns to what extent, if at all, humans within Avicenna’s philosophical system can be said to act freely. It is our contention that only through a careful analysis of Avicenna’s theory of action can one begin to assess his position concerning the status of the will and so provide a satisfactory response to these two interpretative issues. We hope to show that Avicenna can account for divine freedom and that, at least in the case of prophets and sages, humans too are capable of free action.